Notice that the first instance of direct dialogue that we get in the story is a command issued by a husband to his wife, establishing the theme of female subservience to men. The short story also introduces passages that describe the setting of the story, which give the reader a vivid picture of the scene. This certainly is part of it, and women as allies will become a theme as the story progresses. Hale recognizes the main theme of this story: these women are able to determine what happened because they experience a similar plight. Get a feel of the story through the following summary and analysis. The men go upstairs to go over the murder scene again.
Wright must have killed the canary bird. Even though, she knew that murdering an individual is a crime. Although it is clear to the reader that Mrs. Hale to tell about what happened when he went to the house to see John Wright. It is seen as an example of early because two female characters are able to solve a mystery that the male characters cannot. Once again, the typical investigatory frameworks fall short: a theme throughout the story. The team men are headed the Wright house to investigate Mr.
Hale begins to point to another crime: her own abandonment of Mrs. It is more an act of empathy than of guilt. The fact that she was the first reporter on scene, explains that she must have found everything still in place, that makes an incredible impression. When she was a young girl, Minnie Foster had lived in town, wore pretty clothes and sang in the church choir. If we weren't sympathetic to the women after witnessing the men belittle them and their roles, being placed in this feminine area pulls us more strongly to the women's side. The women speculate about the fate of the bird that once filled the cage. The bird cage connects the absence of the bird and the later discovery of its body.
She was reluctant to have left her unsifted flour back in her kitchen. On other occasions, they seemed to ignore the possibility of finding something fruitful amongst the household objects in Minnie's kitchen. The ladies also find the broken cage of the bird. She seems uncomfortable in her role as wife of the sheriff. Held for murder, and worrying about her preserves! Peters asks Lewis Hale to describe what he witnessed at the farmhouse the day before.
Peters reaction to this kind of abuse would have been the same. For purposes of character and plot development, the men in the story are superfluous for the most part. Peters as to why and how they know what they know at that moment. Hale finally discovers this missing link as she goes through her things. Peters discovers a quilt that Minnie Foster was making. It is too big, but she balks at touching the bird.
Wright worried that if the fire went out during the night that the cold in the kitchen would burst her preserve jars, which is what must have happened. In fact, women only gained their right to vote in Canada in 1929; excluding the province of Quebec. Even more ironic, , whose presence is solely in favor of keeping the sheriff s wife company, could be contributed the most to her secret discovery. During the investigation, they failed to scrutinize for clues in the kitchen and focused on the crime scene itself. Order a research paper on Feminism from Paper Masters.
On one side, she is married to the law and on the other side she understands what Minnie has been through. If someone was threatening you or putting you down intentionally, you would finally grow tired and snap under pressure and do anything to make it stop. In a moment of foreshadowing, the attorney mentions the possibility of the women finding a clue. All three of them display a cold lack of understanding of and compassion for the women, allowing them to overlook the plentiful details in the Wright's house about what led up to the murder. The unfortunate death of John Wright was a mystery to all.
Martha Hale- She is one of the two female peers who inspects Mrs. The story was written in a cohesive manner and can be easily grasped. This may be important as by introducing a sense of inequality into the story Glaspell may also be highlighting the inequality that existed between men and women at the time the story was published 1917 with many women being treated as inferior to men in a mainly male dominated society. The story begins with Mr. They are not that close, and to Mrs. He was a law-abiding man who had a good reputation in society. This is one of the questions at the heart of ''A Jury of Her Peers,'' the expanded short story version of Susan Glaspell's one-act play Trifles.
They arrive at the crime scene: the Wrights' lonesome-looking house. Peters; the sheriff, and Mr. This assumption suggests that the sheriff never actually asked his wife why she would want another woman along at the house, choosing instead to mockingly speculate about her motives to others. When she opened it, she saw something wrapped in silk. However, the two women: Mrs. Peters based on her individual features and decided that her small stature and weak voice made Mrs.