B is by this provocation excited to violent rage. State of Bihar, 1997 3 Crimes 200 Pat. If the prosecution would fail to establish that death did not occur within seven years of marriage, this section will not apply; Ratan Lal v. But it may amount to culpable homicide to cause the death of a living child, if any part of that child has been brought forth, though the child may not have breathed or been completely born. And I hereby direct that you be tried by this Court on the said charge.
And I hereby direct that you be tired by his Court on the said charge. Effect caused partly by act and partly by omission:Wherever the causing of a certain effect, or an attempt to cause that effect, by an act or by an omission, is an offence, it is to be understood that the causing of that effect partly by an act and partly by an omission is the same offence. Dishonestly receiving property stolen in the commission of a dacoity. As soon as the bullock begins to move, A has committed theft of the treasure. Added by Act 3 of 1894, sec. Voluntarily causing hurt to extort property, or to constrain to an illegal act. Punishment for wrongful confinement:Whoever wrongfully confines any person shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees, or with both.
Promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, etc. Being member of unlawful assembly:Whoever, being aware of facts which render any assembly an unlawful assembly, intentionally joins that assembly, or continues in it, is said to be a member of an unlawful assembly. When the right of private defence of property extends to causing death The right of private defence of property extends, under the restrictions mentioned in section 99, to the voluntary causing of death or of any other harm to the wrong-doer, if the offence, the committing of which, or the attempting to commit which, occasions the exercise of the right, be an offence of any of the descriptions hereinafter enumerated, namely:— First. Wrongful restraint Whoever voluntarily obstructs any person so as to prevent that person from proceeding in any direction in which that person has right to proceed, is said wrongfully to restrain that person. Liability of agent of owner of occupier for whose benefit riot is committed Whenever a riot is committed for the benefit or on behalf of any person who is the owner or occupier of any land respecting which such riot takes place, or who claims any interest in such land, or in the subject or nay dispute which gave rise to the riot, or who has accepted or derived any benefit there from, the agent or manager or such person shall be punishable with fine, if such agent or manager, having reason to believe that such riot was likely to be committed, or that the unlawful assembly by which such riot was committed was likely to be held, shall not use all lawful means in his power to prevent such riot or assembly from taking place and for suppressing and dispersing the same. And I hereby direct that you be tried by this Court on the said charge. The right of private defence of property against theft continues till the offender has effected his retreat with the property or either the assistance of the public authorities is obtained, or the property has been recovered.
A common nuisance is not excused on the ground that it causes some convenience or advantage. Punishment—Imprisonment for life, or rigorous imprisonment for 10 years and fine—Cognizable—Non-bailable—Triable by Court of Session—Non-compoundable. What is material to attract, the provisions of section 307 is the guilty intention or knowledge with which the all was done, irrespective of its result. A is guilty of an offence under this section. A is guilty of forgery; and if B, knowing the fact, draws the bill upon the paper pursuant to A 's intention, B is also guilty of forgery. Mischief by destroying or moving, etc. A has given false evidence.
A instigates a child to put poison into the food of Z, and gives him poison for that purpose. Abettor present when offence is committed:Whenever any person, who is absent would be liable to be punished as an abettor, is present when the act or offence for which he would be punishable in consequence of the abetment is committed, he shall be deemed to have committed such act or offence. Illustration A instigates B to instigate C to murder Z. A commits no offence if by so firing he harms any of the children. Therefore, from an understanding of the legislative intent of section 300, I. Illustration A, a surgeon in good faith, communicates to a patient his opinion that he cannot live.
Extent to which the right may be exercised. If common intention is proved but no overt act is attributed to the individual accused, section 34 will be attracted as essentially it involves vicarious liability but if participation of the accused in the crime is proved and common intention is absent, section 34 cannot be invoked; Jai Bhagwan v. A has committed criminal breach of trust. Punishment for bribery:Whoever commits the offence of bribery shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to one year, or with fine, or with both : Provided that bribery by treating shall be punished with fine only. In the instant case, the injury caused was the result of blow with a knife in the stomach which was given with such force that the weapon had penetrated the abdomen and had injured the bowels.
Benefit of doubt When ocular evidence in murder case is unreliable benefit of doubt to be given to all accused; Chandu Bhai Shana Bhai Parmar v. Resistance or obstruction to lawful apprehension, or escape or rescue in cases not otherwise provided for. Erasure of mark denoting that stamp has been used Whoever, fraudulently or with intent to cause loss to Government, erase or removes from a stamp issued by the Government for the purpose of revenue, any mark, put or impressed upon such stamp for the purpose of denoting that the same has been used, or knowingly has in his possession or sells or disposes of any such stamp from which such mark has been erased or removed, or sell or disposes of any such stamp which he knows to have been used, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to three years, or with fine, or with both. Illustration A, a coiner, delivers counterfeit Company's rupees to his accomplice B, for the purpose of uttering them. A commits no offence if by so firing he harms any of the children. As this enquiry is a stage of a judicial proceeding, A has given false evidence.
Appreciation of evidence Conviction can be based on testimony of a single eye witness provided his testimony is found reliable and inspires confidence; Anil Phukan v. Here, as A made a false document in order to induce Z to part with property. Public servant in judicial proceeding corruptly making report, etc. Illustration A institutes a suit against Z. Criminal breach of trust by carrier, etc:Whoever being entrusted with property as a carrier, wharfinger or warehouse-keeper, commits criminal breach of trust in respect of such property, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Having possession of counterfeit Government stamp:Whoever has in his possession any stamp which he knows to be a counterfeit of any stamp issued by Government for the purpose of revenue, intending to use, or dispose of the same as a genuine stamp, or in order that it may be used as a genuine stamp, shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine. Threatening any person to give false evidence:Whoever threatens another with any injury to his person, reputation or property or to the person or reputation of any one in whom that person is interested, with intent to cause that person to give false evidence shall be punished with imprisonment of either description for a term which may extend to seven years, or with fine, or with both.